Well as a quick comparison, I drove the 300 before purchasing my Cadenza, I drove a charger as a loaner while my Cadenza was in the shop.
I Liked the 300 better than the Cadenza but also took in the factor that the car gauges and a lot of other functions are electronic now and felt that the risk of a problem with electrical issues was too high for the Chrysler and not worth it in the long run. I do like the ride and drive quality.
The Charger was too cheap in all aspects of a ride quality and features.
The Cadenza fit the overall things I was looking for (ride quality, extra features).
If I had to buy again the price range I was working for I would still purchase a Cadenza. The only thing I can say negative is the electronic steering feature, not a huge fan but thats more personal I think.
I Liked the 300 better than the Cadenza but also took in the factor that the car gauges and a lot of other functions are electronic now and felt that the risk of a problem with electrical issues was too high for the Chrysler and not worth it in the long run. I do like the ride and drive quality.
The Charger was too cheap in all aspects of a ride quality and features.
The Cadenza fit the overall things I was looking for (ride quality, extra features).
If I had to buy again the price range I was working for I would still purchase a Cadenza. The only thing I can say negative is the electronic steering feature, not a huge fan but thats more personal I think.